• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

InFront on the Workforce

Long-term and post-acute care publication

Subscribe | Events | Advertise | Contact Us

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

  • HOME
  • ABOUT
    • Who We Are & What We Do
    • The Vision
    • Readership
  • RESOURCES
    • Important Links
  • Retention & Engagement
  • Culture & Leadership
  • Regulatory
  • Technology
  • Industry Trends

(10/31) National Safety Council Says No Amount of Marijuana is OK for ‘Safety Sensitive’ Jobs

By Joanne Kaldy / October 31, 2019

The legalization of marijuana has become welcome news for some, but it’s causing headaches for employers. To help provide some guidance, the National Safety Council (NSC) has released a position statement supporting policies “to mitigate and eliminate the risks of cannabis (marijuana).”

Specifically, the document says:

  • The NSC “believes there is no level of cannabis use that is safe or acceptable for employees who work in safety-sensitive positions.”
  • Employees who tested positive for cannabis have 85% more injuries and 75% more absenteeisms than those who test negative.
  • Cannabis affects the body in various ways. According to the NSC statement, “Experimental studies of subjects dosed with cannabis found [that] psychological effects include slowed fine motor skills, reddening of eyes, increased appetite, dry mouth, and increased heart rate. These effects contribute to impaired learning, short-term memory and attention deficits, and delayed decision-making.”

To date, 46 states and the District of Columbia (DC) have passed medical cannabis laws. Several states also have passed laws addressing recreational use. DC, plus Alaska, California, Colorado, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington, have adopted the most expansive laws for recreational marijuana use. Most other states allow for limited use of medical marijuana under specific circumstances.

Because marijuana remains illegal under federal law, you can prohibit its use by employees even in their homes and on nonworking hours and even if the employee is complying with state law and a physician’s recommendation, but you have to word the policy carefully.

Read the full article.

Related Posts

  • (FEATURED BRIEF) More Than One-Third of Business Owners Not Prepared to Manage Legalized Marijuana in the Workplace
  • (10/30) Putting Humanity into HR Compliance: 8 Ways to Make Meetings Work
  • Would Your Safety Incentive Program Violate OSHA Standards?
  • (2/05) Winter Weather Tests Employers’ FLSA, Safety Compliance
  • (1/17) Employee Experience Rarely Exceeds Expectations, Study Says

Categories: HR Industry Brief /

Primary Sidebar

AROUND THE WEB

Items of interest from across the web.

  • (6/28) Employees Probably Don’t See Your Corporate Culture the Same Way You Do — TLNT
  • (6/28) Why You Need Workforce Planning – Workforce.com
  • (6/27) Employers Prepare Benefits and Policy Responses to Abortion Ruling, SHRM Survey Finds – SHRM
  • (6/27) Staffing Trends Study Could Create Roadmap for Helping Long-Term Care Industry – McKnights
  • (6/24) Former CMS Administrator Predicts Dire Near-Term Outlook for Home Health Industry – Home Health Care News
  • (6/24) Number of the Day: Skyrocketing Turnover – HR Executive
  • (6/23) ProMedica Senior Care President: Nursing Home Operators Need to ‘Embrace the Disruption’ – Skilled Nursing News
  • (6/23) How Employers Can Avoid ‘Rainbow Washing’ — SHRM
  • (6/22) Fine-Tune Compensation Strategies to Keep Workers On Board – SHRM

 

 

 

View All

CONTACT INFO

Publisher: CC Andrews
440.638.6990
Editor: Joanne Kaldy

PO Box 360727
Cleveland, OH 44136

CATEGORIES

  • CULTURE & LEADERSHIP
  • RETENTION & ENGAGEMENT
  • REGULATORY
  • TECHNOLOGY
  • TRENDS IN THE INDUSTRY

Copyright © 2022 - InFrontWorkforce.com. All rights reserved.