• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

InFront on the Workforce

Long-term and post-acute care publication

Subscribe | Events | Advertise | Contact Us

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

  • HOME
  • ABOUT
    • Who We Are & What We Do
    • The Vision
    • Readership
  • RESOURCES
    • Important Links
  • Retention & Engagement
  • Culture & Leadership
  • Regulatory
  • Technology
  • Industry Trends

(3/2) ‘A Source of Tremendous Discrimination’: Why Hair Policies Matter

By Joanne Kaldy / March 2, 2020

Do you have a hair policy for employees? If so, you may want to review it. It may be having a discriminatory impact:

  • Last year California became the first state to ban employment discrimination based on hairstyles. The Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair (CROWN) Act prohibits policies that discriminate against individuals with natural hairstyles. Several other states have introduced similar bills.
  • Some employment attorneys say that policies banning certain hairstyles (such as Afros or dreadlocks) may be considered race discrimination. At the same time, a prohibition of long hair or requiring employees to be clean-shaven could discriminate against certain religions.
  • Some companies may have hair-related policies for health or safety reasons. For instance, requiring that workers keep their hair short if they work around food, flames, machinery, or chemicals.
  • All companies should have policies that protect workers from hair-based discrimination. This should be explicit enough to protect minority groups who may face negative consequences when they don’t conform to majority “norms.”
  • When this policy is announced, organizational leader should clarify the reason for having it.

Read the full article.

Related Posts

  • (FEATURED BRIEF) Why Automation Can Actually Improve Employee Engagement
  • (2/20) Why Workplace Ghosting Is on the Rise
  • (3/21) Why You Should Care about the Cost of Turnover
  • (10/16) This Is Why You Have to Take Employee Experience Seriously
  • (8/9) Do You Really Know Why Employees Leave Your Company?

Categories: HR Industry Brief /

Primary Sidebar

AROUND THE WEB

Items of interest from across the web.

  • As More States Are Legalizing Marijuana, How Should Employers Respond – HR Executive
  • Giving Thanks for Senior Living Employees, Leaders — McKnights
  • 22 States Petition CMS to End Mandate As 76% of SNF Staff Behind on Vaccines – Skilled Nursing News
  • 6 Ways to Re-energize a Depleted Team – Harvard Business Review
  • 7 Ways to Lift Up the Employees’ Morale Ahead of Holiday Season — Entrepreneur
  • Workforce, Financial Relief Focus in ‘Tumultuous Period’ After Midterms: Argentum – McKnights
  • 6 Steps to Creating More Inclusive Job Descriptions – HR Morning
  • Mental Wellbeing and Resilience: Tech + Culture to the Rescue – HR Daily Advisor
  • Employers Have ‘Flexibility Fatigue.’ But That Could Put Them on the Wrong Side of the ADA. – HR Dive(11/16) Employers Must Push Preventive Care to Inflation-Worried Staff – TLNT

View All

CONTACT INFO

Publisher: CC Andrews
440.638.6990
Editor: Joanne Kaldy

PO Box 360727
Cleveland, OH 44136

CATEGORIES

  • CULTURE & LEADERSHIP
  • RETENTION & ENGAGEMENT
  • REGULATORY
  • TECHNOLOGY
  • TRENDS IN THE INDUSTRY

Copyright © 2025 - InFrontWorkforce.com. All rights reserved.